Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 30: 100681, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38327279

ABSTRACT

Background: There is a lack of up-to-date estimates about the prevalence of Chagas disease (ChD) clinical presentations and, therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence of clinical forms of ChD among seropositive adults, pooling available data. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in Medline, Embase, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde and Cochrane databases looking for studies published from 1990 to August 2023, which investigated the prevalence of ChD clinical forms among seropositive adults, including: (i) indeterminate phase, (ii) chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM), (iii) digestive and (iv) mixed (CCM + digestive) forms. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Studies quality and risk of bias was assessed with the Leboeuf-Yde and Lauritsen tool. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. The study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022354237). Findings: 1246 articles were selected for screening and 73 studies were included in the final analysis (17,132 patients, 44% men). Most studies were conducted with outpatients (n = 50), followed by population-based studies (n = 15). The pooled prevalence of the ChD clinical forms was: indeterminate 42.6% (95% CI: 36.9-48.6), CCM 42.7% (95% CI: 37.3-48.3), digestive 17.7% (95% CI: 14.9-20.9), and mixed 10.2% (95% CI: 7.9-13.2). In population-based studies, prevalence was lower for CCM (31.2%, 95% CI: 24.4-38.9) and higher for indeterminate (47.2%, 95% CI: 39.0-55.5) form. In meta-regression, age was inversely associated with the prevalence of indeterminate (ß = -0.05, P < 0.001) form, and directly associated with CCM (ß = 0.06, P < 0.001) and digestive (ß = 0.02, P < 0.001) forms. Heterogeneity was overall high. Interpretation: Compared to previous publications, our pooled estimates show a higher prevalence of CCM among ChD seropositive patients, but similar rates of the digestive form. Funding: This study was funded by the World Heart Federation, through a research collaboration with Novartis Pharma AG.

2.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 2, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38222097

ABSTRACT

Chagas disease (ChD), a Neglected Tropical Disease, has witnessed a transformative epidemiological landscape characterized by a trend of reduction in prevalence, shifting modes of transmission, urbanization, and globalization. Historically a vector-borne disease in rural areas of Latin America, effective control measures have reduced the incidence in many countries, leading to a demographic shift where most affected individuals are now adults. However, challenges persist in regions like the Gran Chaco, and emerging oral transmission in the Amazon basin adds complexity. Urbanization and migration from rural to urban areas and to non-endemic countries, especially in Europe and the US, have redefined the disease's reach. These changing patterns contribute to uncertainties in estimating ChD prevalence, exacerbated by the lack of recent data, scarcity of surveys, and reliance on outdated models. Besides, ChD's lifelong natural history, marked by acute and chronic phases, introduces complexities in diagnosis, particularly in non-endemic regions where healthcare provider awareness is low. The temporal dissociation of infection and clinical manifestations, coupled with underreporting, has rendered ChD invisible in health statistics. Deaths attributed to ChD cardiomyopathy often go unrecognized, camouflaged under alternative causes. Understanding these challenges, the RAISE project aims to reassess the burden of ChD and ChD cardiomyopathy. The project is a collaborative effort of the World Heart Federation, Novartis Global Health, the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and a team of specialists coordinated by Brazil's Federal University of Minas Gerais. Employing a multidimensional strategy, the project seeks to refine estimates of ChD-related deaths, conduct systematic reviews on seroprevalence and prevalence of clinical forms, enhance existing modeling frameworks, and calculate the global economic burden, considering healthcare expenditures and service access. The RAISE project aspires to bridge knowledge gaps, raise awareness, and inform evidence-based health policies and research initiatives, positioning ChD prominently on the global health agenda.


Subject(s)
Chagas Cardiomyopathy , Chagas Disease , Adult , Humans , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Chagas Disease/epidemiology , Chagas Disease/diagnosis , Chagas Cardiomyopathy/epidemiology , Latin America/epidemiology , Prevalence
3.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 17(11): e0011757, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected disease affecting millions worldwide, yet little is known about its economic burden. This systematic review is part of RAISE project, a broader study that aims to estimate the global prevalence, mortality, and health and economic burden attributable to chronic CD and Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. The objective of this study was to assess the main costs associated with the treatment of CD in both endemic and non-endemic countries. METHODS: An electronic search of the Medline, Lilacs, and Embase databases was conducted until 31st, 2022, to identify and select economic studies that evaluated treatment costs of CD. No restrictions on place or language were made. Complete or partial economic analyses were included. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included, with two-thirds referring to endemic countries. The most commonly investigated cost components were inpatient care, exams, surgeries, consultation, drugs, and pacemakers. However, significant heterogeneity in the estimation methods and presentation of data was observed, highlighting the absence of standardization in the measurement methods and cost components. The most common component analyzed using the same metric was hospitalization. The mean annual hospital cost per patient ranges from $25.47 purchasing power parity US dollars (PPP-USD) to $18,823.74 PPP-USD, and the median value was $324.44 PPP-USD. The lifetime hospital cost per patient varies from $209,44 PPP-USD for general care to $14,351.68 PPP-USD for patients with heart failure. DISCUSSION: Despite the limitations of the included studies, this study is the first systematic review of the costs of CD treatment. The findings underscore the importance of standardizing the measurement methods and cost components for estimating the economic burden of CD and improving the comparability of cost components magnitude and cost composition analysis. Finally, assessing the economic burden is essential for public policies designed to eliminate CD, given the continued neglect of this disease.


Subject(s)
Chagas Cardiomyopathy , Chagas Disease , Heart Failure , Humans , Cost of Illness , Financial Stress , Chagas Disease/epidemiology
4.
Rev. colomb. cancerol ; 12(2): 63-73, 2008. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-496943

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar la costo-efectividad y la costo-utilidad del sunitinib frente al interferón-alfa (IFN-α) como tratamientos de primera línea para pacientes con carcinoma de células renales metastásico en Colombia. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis de costoefectividady de costo-utilidad. La efectividad se midió en años de vida ganados libres de progresión de la enfermedad y en años de vida ganados, y la utilidad, en años de vida ganados ajustados por calidad (AVAC). Las medidas de efectividad fueron extraídas de un estudio clínico, y las del uso de servicios, de una serie de 15 pacientes con carcinoma de células renales metastásico tratadosen Colombia, ajustados por la opinión de expertos locales; los costos de los medicamentos fueron tomados de una institución de referencia. Los costos se expresaron en pesos colombianos de 2006 utilizando una tasa de descuento del 5por ciento anual Resultados: Para el caso base, el análisis demostró una diferencia a favor del sunitinib de $13,47 millones, con una efectividad superior en 0,23 años libres de progresión, un incremento de 0,05 años de vida y a un aumento en AVAC de 0,07. Las razones de costo-efectividad incremental y de costo-utilidad incremental fueron negativas. Conclusiones: El sunitinib fue menos costoso y más efectivo para el tratamiento incial del carcinoma de células renales metastático en la serie de pacientes analizada.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Cost of Illness , Drug Costs , Colombia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...